Trolley Canal Boats
› Forums › Ton avis sur… › Trolley Canal Boats
Ce sujet a 0 réponse, 1 participant et a été mis à jour par mazierivenburg7, il y a 2 mois et 1 semaine.
-
AuteurMessages
-
mazierivenburg7<br> I’ll take the topic of electrical specifications (potential and current on telephone lines) as a chance to give some examples of the variation you see in practice. According to the Feed the Beast Wiki article, Electrical Engines take 6 EU/t and output 2 MJ/t. The trolleyboat turned out to be a better option than the battery powered electric boat, because the cargo space was mainly left intact – electric motors were smaller than steam engines and no batteries were needed. The batteries would take up almost all the cargo space. Because of these challenges, another obvious method – electric boats powered by batteries – was no solution either. Ultimately, engineers found the solution in electric propulsion without the use of batteries. The obvious solution to canal barge transport was the steam engine – the same technology that kept trains going. At the end of the article I will explain why it is time to ditch these and finally give the trolley systems the attention they deserve; they are our best chance to develop a completely oil independent, land-based cargo transport network with a large capacity. Most of these systems were initially powered by steam engines, and later adapted to electricity, which made them much more efficient and practical.<br>
<br> As the boat had more or less lateral movement, the contact arrangement had to be flexible, and as the canal could not be used as a return, a double metallic circuit had to be used. The cable was provided with links to which the rope was affixed that hauls the boat along (see engraving below). The 6 kilometre (3.7 miles) long track went through a 3.3 kilometre (2 miles) long tunnel (in « Pouilly-en-Auxois ») and replaced a steam powered cable hauler that was in use since 1867. That this electric system (and others, see further below) served to pass through tunnel was no coincidence. The line formed part of a 47 kilometre (29 miles) long trajectory served by electric mules (see further) and was only operated for a couple of years. Decisive action is needed to reverse the past thirty years of failed policies. It is spending about $25 million per year, and at that rate, the utility will not finish until 2024. By that time, some of its replacement cable will be 38 years old.<br>
<br> If your phone ever malfunctions, the telco will likely ask you to take it directly to the NID, unplug your household wiring, and plug your phone straight into the jack. This is their preferred outcome, and you will be told to use your non-functioning phone to call an electrician. Although it is very nearly zero, a change in pressure will result in a change in density. Some of that new nuclear-generated power from the Southeast will be used locally, for growing demand, and some will be wheeled to the energy-short regions of the mid-Atlantic and Northeast, which refuse to build their own capacity. One of the first alternatives for animal power was the trolley propeller system. In 1903, the Germans experimented with a propeller powered trolleyboat on the Teltow canal (first picture above). Below is a picture of what seems to be the only propeller powered trolleyboat line that was ever operated in a commercial way. Initially steam engines were used (see illustration on the right and picture below), but some of these were later replaced by electric motors, combined with a trolley system. The two electric motors (of 25 HP each) powered two screw propellers and received current from a pair of wires suspended over the canal through two ordinary underbearing trolley poles (picture on the right).<br>
<br> Unmanned electric mules – engine on the banks or over the water. In those times, canals were simply a large ditch without reinforced banks. The reason was the state of the canals. Most countries chose to further deepen out and reinforce their canals in order to allow self-propelled steam and, a bit later, diesel boats. In most countries, animal traction remained the only method in use on the canals, until it was superseded by diesel engines in the 1930s or later, or until the canals fell into disrepair altogether (like in the United Kingdom). This method was very efficient compared to non-motorised land-based transport; a horse could carry 10 times more cargo in this way than was possible when hauling a cart on the road. In addition to chronological age, overheating of equipment that is caused by heavy electricity use and is repeatedly stressed will age faster, what is electric cable and is more likely to fail suddenly. But it is foolhardy to think that the needed investments will be made under the present regime. Trolley propeller towing – engine on the boat.<br>
-
AuteurMessages